Annotated Bibliography: Why Should Toxic Chemicals Be Regulated?

Posted: March 27th, 2020

Annotated Bibliography: Why Should Toxic Chemicals Be Regulated?

Student’s Name

Institutional Affiliation

Annotated Bibliography: Why Should Toxic Chemicals Be Regulated?

The discourse on the regulation of toxic chemicals is attributed to their adverse consequences on people and the environment. Over the years, companies have polluted natural resources to save costs required in implementing protective procedures. Despite the applications of legal measures and the inclination towards sustainability, much needs to be done in ensuring that toxic chemicals are properly managed and disposed of.

Cutler, D., & Dominici, F. (2018). A breath of bad air: Cost of the Trump environmental agenda may lead to 80000 extra deaths per decade. Journal of the American Medical Association, 319(22), 2261-2262. Retrieved from https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2684596?appid=scweb&appid=scweb&alert=article.  

In this scholarly article, Cutler and Dominici argue that the amendments proposed by the Trump administration regarding environmental regulations are more likely to impose adverse consequences on human health. The need to repeal regulations such as the Clean Power Plan Rule and the Waters of the United States rule will expose Americans to cardiovascular and respiratory ailments (Cutler & Dominici, 2018). The study is aimed at environmental lobbyists and policymakers because it highlights the illogical nature of altering laws that have managed to safeguard public health against exposure to dangerous industrial chemicals such as mercury, nitrogen oxide, and sulfur dioxide.

Krimsky, S. (2017). The unsteady state and inertia of chemical regulation under the US Toxic Substances Control Act. PLoS Biology, 15(12), e2002404. Retrieved from http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2002404.

In the research study, Krimsky (2017) argues that several dimensions have impeded the application of a strong regulatory approach towards chemical safety. Even though the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 proved instrumental in curbing the commercial manufacturing of toxic chemicals, aspects such as the inability to verify irrational risk and insufficient federal authority in the acquisition and safety and health information have necessitated a call for change.

The scholarly article is intended for policymakers since it concentrates on the present drawbacks that affect the regulatory regime on the production of industrial chemicals.

Conclusion

The articles annotated illuminate the current challenges facing the regulation of toxic chemicals in the United States. Environmental policies such as the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 and related rules have been subject to debilitating factors that hinder their effectiveness. Nonetheless, the information conveyed in these works calls for adequate attention towards such aspects to reinforce the standardization of toxic chemicals in the long-term.

References

Cutler, D., & Dominici, F. (2018). A breath of bad air: Cost of the Trump environmental agenda may lead to 80000 extra deaths per decade. Journal of the American Medical Association, 319(22), 2261-2262. Retrieved from https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2684596?appid=scweb&appid=scweb&alert=article.

Krimsky, S. (2017). The unsteady state and inertia of chemical regulation under the US Toxic Substances Control Act. PLoS Biology, 15(12), e2002404. Retrieved from http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2002404.